Data Tiers prototypes
Index lifecycle policies
Let's elevate the prominence of the default policies to make it easier for users to follow best practices. Let's hide the custom policies so that advanced users can still access them, but they don't compete with the default policies that address 80% of use cases.
Create index lifecycle policy
How do we emphasize the sequential nature of data tiers in the UI? How do we help the user differentiate between the steps? How do we give them an overview of how this policy behaves?
Timing comparison
Hot tier
Active
- Rollover
- Enabled
- Maximum index size
- 50gb
- Maximum age
- 30 days
- Index priority
- 1
- Actions
- ShrinkForce merge
Warm tier
Active
- Rollover
- Enabled
- Maximum index size
- 50gb
- Maximum age
- 30 days
- Index priority
- 1
- Actions
- ShrinkForce merge
Cold tier
Active
Cold tier not active
Frozen tier
Active
- Rollover
- Enabled
- Maximum index size
- 50gb
- Maximum age
- 30 days
- Index priority
- 1
- Actions
- ShrinkForce merge
Data streams
What do data tiers look like in the context of data streams? What would users find useful about this?
Name | Indices | Errors | |
---|---|---|---|
Name data-stream-1 | Indices 125 | Errors 19 | |
Name data-stream-2 | Indices 2922 | Errors 0 | |
Name data-stream-3 | Indices 56 | Errors 3 | |
Name data-stream-4 | Indices 0 | Errors 0 | |
Name data-stream-5 | Indices 438 | Errors 0 |
Cluster supervisor
What does the cluster state look like through the lens of data tiers? What would users find useful about this?
Hot tier
- Performance
- Fast
- Cost
- Highest
- Duration
- Weeks
- Nodes
- 4
- Indices
- 12182
Warm tier
- Performance
- Medium to fast
- Cost
- Moderate
- Duration
- Weeks
- Nodes
- 2
- Indices
- 34552
Cold tier
- Performance
- Slow to fast
- Cost
- Low
- Duration
- Months
Frozen tier
- Performance
- Very slow
- Cost
- Lowest
- Duration
- Years
- Nodes
- 1
- Indices
- 786323